Is your site Web 2.0 ready ?

Funny: rodrigo.typepad.com gets a 7/34, sepulveda.net gets a 1/35 (normal: it’s a simple HTML page with a redirect), and vpod.tv gets 2/35.

And it won’t let you test the site itself on itself . Here are the questions:

• Is in public beta?  Yes!
• Uses inline AJAX ?  No
• Uses python?  No
• Uses the prefix "meta" or "micro"?  No
• Is Shadows-aware ?  No
• Uses Cascading Style Sheets?  Yes!
• Appears to be web 3.0 ?  Yes!
• Refers to mash-ups ?  No
• Mentions startup ?  No
• Uses Google Maps API?  No
• Has a Blogline blogroll ?  Yes!
• Has favicon ?  No
• Attempts to be XHTML Strict ?  No
• Mentions Dave Legg ?  No
• Appears to use AJAX ?  No
• Refers to the Web 2.0 Validator's ruleset ?  No
• Appears to be built using Ruby on Rails ?  No
• Refers to VCs ?  No
• Refers to Flickr ?  Yes!
• Mentions Nitro ?  No
• Links Slashdot and Digg ?  No
• Mentions Cool Words ?  No
• Mentions Ruby ?  No
• Has prototype.js ?  No
• Actually mentions Web 2.0 ?  Yes!
• Refers to del.icio.us ?  No
• Refers to Rocketboom ?  No
• Mentions RDF and the Semantic Web?  No
• Refers to web2.0validator ?  No
• Uses microformats ?  No
• Validates as XHTML 1.1 ?  No
• Appears to have Adsense ?  Yes!
• Mentions 30 Second Rule and Web 2.0 ?  No
• Uses the "blink" tag?  No

(Via kelblog)